Re: UnixWare

spafcs.purdue.edu

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: smbresearch.att.com: "Re: ICMP unreachables"
• Previous message: Doug Hughes: "Re: UnixWare (I think it's time to pick a new subject)"
• In reply to: a.e.mossberg: "Re: UnixWare"
• Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "HP's security stance (was Re: UnixWare)"

I've had several people tell me that HP has gotten better recently.  I
would have mentioned them as good examples, except:

1) I have not seen them make any security patch announcements to any
of the established security-related newsgroups or mailing lists.

2) HP does not have a member or liason in FIRST, nor have they had
any presence at any of the incident response workshops.

3) I have read accounts of HP customers not being able to get security
patches because they aren't paying for maintenance.

#3 may no longer be true; in any event, I have no direct experience
with it so I can't say it was ever more than a misunderstanding.


--spaf

• Next message: smbresearch.att.com: "Re: ICMP unreachables"
• Previous message: Doug Hughes: "Re: UnixWare (I think it's time to pick a new subject)"
• In reply to: a.e.mossberg: "Re: UnixWare"
• Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "HP's security stance (was Re: UnixWare)"