|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
HP's security stance (was Re: UnixWare)
Bennett Todd (bet
std.sbi.com)Thu, 28 Apr 1994 13:32:08 -0400 (EDT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: David A. Curry: "Re: UnixWare"
- Previous message: Paul A Vixie: "Re: selective gateways"
- In reply to: Gene Spafford: "Re: UnixWare"
- Next in thread: Gene Spafford: "Re: HP's security stance (was Re: UnixWare)"
Gene Spafford writes:
>1) I have not seen them make any security patch announcements to any
>of the established security-related newsgroups or mailing lists.
I have. For example:
Newsgroups: comp.security.unix,comp.sys.hp.hpux
From: bkelley
cup.hp.com (Bob Kelley)
Subject: HEWLETT-PACKARD SECURITY BULLETING: #00007
Message-Id: <Cotx6G.Fns
cup.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 1994 19:08:40 GMT
>2) HP does not have a member or liason in FIRST, nor have they had
>any presence at any of the incident response workshops.
Considering CERT's amazing lack of contribution to improving security, I
consider this a sign of HP's good faith. Some folks want to see security
bugs fixed, not lovingly preserved for the amusement of future generations.
-Bennett
bet
sbi.com
- Next message: David A. Curry: "Re: UnixWare"
- Previous message: Paul A Vixie: "Re: selective gateways"
- In reply to: Gene Spafford: "Re: UnixWare"
- Next in thread: Gene Spafford: "Re: HP's security stance (was Re: UnixWare)"