|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994
Gene Spafford (spaf
cs.purdue.edu)Wed, 30 Nov 1994 10:24:14 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: John V. A. Janeri: "Re: bugtraq-digest V1 #57"
- Previous message: Robert M. Haas: "Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994"
- In reply to: RAS
CACDVAX.CACD.ROCKWELL.COM: "Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994"
- Next in thread: Gene Spafford: "Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994"
> Are there any well substantiated facts which show that full disclosure > harms the situation? Yes, and several have been posted here and in the newsgroups over the last year. Several have also been presented at the FIRST conferences. Ask anyone on a response team, where they deal with dozens of breakins a week (or a day, in some cases), and they can give you lots of evidence (assuming their internal policies allow them to disclose details of cases). --spaf
- Next message: John V. A. Janeri: "Re: bugtraq-digest V1 #57"
- Previous message: Robert M. Haas: "Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994"
- In reply to: RAS
CACDVAX.CACD.ROCKWELL.COM: "Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994"
- Next in thread: Gene Spafford: "Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994"