|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: pt_chmod
Bela Lubkin (belal
sco.COM)Fri, 2 Dec 1994 21:22:43 -0800
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: an83851
anon.penet.fi: "[8lgm]-Advisory-79.UNIX.command.10-Feb-1995"
- Previous message: Neil Woods: "binmail tmpfile script"
- Maybe in reply to: carson
lehman.com: "pt_chmod"
- Next in thread: Karl Strickland: "Re: pt_chmod"
Carson Gaspar wrote: > Does anyone know what the pt_chmod hole is? The same suid program exists in > Solaris 2.x, and knowing Sun's track record... By my testing, exactly the same bug exists on Solaris 2.3/SPARC; however, it does not cause a security hole there. The security hole is caused by how the SCO execution environment treats NULL dereferences. The same bug probably exists in the pt_chmod source on most System V systems; whether it causes a security problem depends on how the OS treats NULL dereferences. Full disclosure has been sent to CERT for dissemination to other OS vendors. I am not in a position to publically disclose full details at this time; I also think that to do so would be rude to other OS vendors who have not had a chance to issue their own fixes. Your pt_chmod is safe if it coredumps when run as `pt_chmod < /etc/termcap`. If not, it might or might not be safe. Ask your OS vendor, "trace" or "truss". I'm sorry that I can't say more. >Bela<
- Next message: an83851
anon.penet.fi: "[8lgm]-Advisory-79.UNIX.command.10-Feb-1995"
- Previous message: Neil Woods: "binmail tmpfile script"
- Maybe in reply to: carson
lehman.com: "pt_chmod"
- Next in thread: Karl Strickland: "Re: pt_chmod"