|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Various Solaris 2.3 file permission problems
Bob Dowling (rjd4
ucs.cam.ac.uk)Thu, 19 Jan 1995 12:12:26 +0000
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alexander Haiut: "Re: Attach on DES paper???"
- Previous message: Robert Moskowitz: "Attach on DES paper???"
- In reply to: jim
Tadpole.COM: "Re: Various Solaris 2.3 file permission problems"
- Next in thread: Pete Hartman: "Re: Re: Various Solaris 2.3 file permission problems"
I believe Solaris 2.4 is going to fix the permissions on all files that
are *installed* by the installation system. I suspect that most, if
not all, of the files *created* by the newly installed system that had
the wrong permissions will still have bad permissions. By "created" as
opposed to "installed", I mean things like log files, spool files etc.
The reason for this is that Sun gets its umask wrong on a default
system, including the system started up off the CD or whatever to run
suninstall.
A good symptom of this error is the umask of inetd and hence of in.ftpd.
As is well known, in a default Solaris 2 installation, files transferred
in (so the ftpd is local) arrive with mode 0666.
We are currently running a Solaris 2.3 system with an added file
/etc/init.d/umask.sh that has a single non-comment line: "umask 0022".
There is also a link in /etc/rc2.d/S00umask.sh. This fixes the umask of
everything that doesn't explicitly change it back again. It has caused
us no problems that we've noticed.
--------
Bob Dowling: UNIX Support,
University of Cambridge Computing Service,
rjd4
cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Pembroke Street,
+44 1223 334728 Cambridge, UK. CB2 3QG.
--------
0666: The Mode of The Beast
- Next message: Alexander Haiut: "Re: Attach on DES paper???"
- Previous message: Robert Moskowitz: "Attach on DES paper???"
- In reply to: jim
Tadpole.COM: "Re: Various Solaris 2.3 file permission problems"
- Next in thread: Pete Hartman: "Re: Re: Various Solaris 2.3 file permission problems"