|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: NYT Article this morning
David Kovar (kovar
NDA.COM)Mon, 23 Jan 1995 20:46:20 -0500 (EST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Christopher Klaus: "Re: address spoof/no return packets"
- Previous message: Mark Crother: "CIAC Advisory F-08: IP Address Spoofing and Hijacked Session Attacks (fwd)"
- Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks
vt.edu: "Re: NYT Article this morning"
> To fully fix the problem will require all the vendors to come out with > kernel patches to make the TCP sequence numbering difficult to guess, then > have all the admins apply those patches to all the machines on Internet, > and then we will have solved the problem. (While we are at it, have > admins install patches that stop get-root scripts also). Pretty simple and > quick to implement. <grin> I don't have access to the source for the appropriate modules, but it seems to me that this is a relatively simple change. What am I missing? -David
- Next message: Christopher Klaus: "Re: address spoof/no return packets"
- Previous message: Mark Crother: "CIAC Advisory F-08: IP Address Spoofing and Hijacked Session Attacks (fwd)"
- Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks
vt.edu: "Re: NYT Article this morning"