|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
"Secure Socket Layer" protocol (NYT Article)
Richard Huddleston (reh
wam.umd.edu)Mon, 23 Jan 1995 21:46:01 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: "Secure Socket Layer" protocol (NYT Article)"
- Previous message: Timothy Newsham: "Re: NFS packet blocking (Was Mouse EXPLOIT info...)"
- Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: "Secure Socket Layer" protocol (NYT Article)"
* Christopher Klaus says: * > To fully fix the problem will require all the vendors to come out with * > kernel patches to make the TCP sequence numbering difficult to * > guess, * Even that is insufficient, actually. If you see a packet going by, you * can still try to jam the works up and steal the connection anyway. The * only permanent solution is a cryptographic security protocol for the * net -- one is actually in the works now in the IETF. * Perry There's a protocol being touted by Netcape Communications Corportation (formerly Mosaic Communications Corportation) which is supposedly strong enough to conduct commerce over. It's description is in a document with all the RFC-bound trappings, located on http://www.mcom.com/ someplace. I'm not a member of the Brainiac Protocol Busters Club, but the protocol looks pretty good to me. In lieu of the IETF protocol, has anybody spotted flaws in the SSL ? It's up and working now, apparently. Richard