|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: IP spoofing vs tcp wrappers and netacl
Perry E. Metzger (perry
imsi.com)Tue, 24 Jan 1995 13:07:28 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Quentin Fennessy: "Re: Hijacking tool"
- Previous message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: NYT Article this morning"
- In reply to: Christopher Klaus: "Re: IP spoofing vs tcp wrappers and netacl"
- Next in thread: Christopher Klaus: "Re: IP spoofing vs tcp wrappers and netacl"
Christopher Klaus says: > Probably the best way to prevent IP spoofing attacks is to turn off all > ip-based authenication services, ie rsh, rlogin are the main ones. Insufficient. If you can see at least part of the packet stream, you can session-steal. This makes a mockery of things like S/Key. Perry
- Next message: Quentin Fennessy: "Re: Hijacking tool"
- Previous message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: NYT Article this morning"
- In reply to: Christopher Klaus: "Re: IP spoofing vs tcp wrappers and netacl"
- Next in thread: Christopher Klaus: "Re: IP spoofing vs tcp wrappers and netacl"