|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Anti Hijacking tools
der Mouse (mouse
Collatz.McRCIM.McGill.EDU)Sat, 28 Jan 1995 12:43:34 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Karl Strickland: "Re: Anti Hijacking tools"
- Previous message: Julian Assange: "Re: preventing sequence number guessing"
- Maybe in reply to: Pete Shipley: "Anti Hijacking tools"
- Next in thread: jsz: "Re: Anti Hijacking tools"
>> I don't call it a solution either, but more because the security can >> so easily be defeated with the help of a reboot. > Can't you reload kernel itself in kmem? Why reboot? With my code, you can't open /dev/mem or /dev/kmem for write - even as root - after you lock the door. > OW 3.0 & 3.0_U1 (that's for Solaris 1.1.X) [...] Of course you can > recommend using motif.. This sounds as though you're confusing client-side L&F specs with servers. Motif is a L&F spec and an implementation of that spec; OW is a whole environment, but the relevant part here is the server. One could run mwm and (other) Motif clients on an OW server just fine...and OL clients and window manager on any other server (provided PostScript isn't needed, of course). (Personally, I stand aside from the OL-vs-Motif squabble, since I find them both comparably intolerable. Sort of like seeing people arguing over whether they'd rather be executed by guillotine or hanging. Not that window system religious wars are really bugtraq fodder....) der Mouse mousecollatz.mcrcim.mcgill.edu
- Next message: Karl Strickland: "Re: Anti Hijacking tools"
- Previous message: Julian Assange: "Re: preventing sequence number guessing"
- Maybe in reply to: Pete Shipley: "Anti Hijacking tools"
- Next in thread: jsz: "Re: Anti Hijacking tools"