|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: snooper watchers
Timothy Jones (tim
cs.columbia.edu)Mon, 27 Feb 1995 01:14:25 +0100 (MET)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: bob
unix.worldcom.com: "8-bit characters in addresses"
- Previous message: Thomas Roessler: "Re: A (possibly) better way to get input integrity"
- Maybe in reply to: Ben Taylor: "snooper watchers"
- Next in thread: Leo Bicknell: "Re: snooper watchers"
Has anyone built a system sharing a dual-ported disk between the server (checkee) and another machine that runs something like tripwire (checker)? Obviously, the checker shouldn't be attached to the 'net... Tim Gene Rackow writes: > If I turn the paranoid mode up a notch or two here.. > What is to stop someone from mounting another filesystem over the top of > your tripwire database and crontab entries. Replace the mount and df > commands to not show the new mount point. Now you continue to believe > that you are a happy camper, all safe and secure. > > You really need to do a seperation of the checkee from the checkor. > If someone has root access on the machine, the could basicly do anything that > is needed to cover their tracks.
- Next message: bob
unix.worldcom.com: "8-bit characters in addresses"
- Previous message: Thomas Roessler: "Re: A (possibly) better way to get input integrity"
- Maybe in reply to: Ben Taylor: "snooper watchers"
- Next in thread: Leo Bicknell: "Re: snooper watchers"