|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: impossible vs. impractical
Perry E. Metzger (perry
imsi.com)Mon, 08 May 1995 10:02:31 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
- Previous message: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
- In reply to: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
- Next in thread: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
Dr. Frederick B. Cohen says: > > Oh good. I think possibility has practicality implied. After all, if you > > can generate an infinite amount of energy, you CAN go the speed of light > > (according to the current laws of physics), so there, it's not impossible. > > But according to current physics, there is a finite amount of total > energy in the Universe, You've proven the Universe is closed then, and non-inflationary to boot? You are better than I suspected, Dr. Cohen. .pm
- Next message: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
- Previous message: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
- In reply to: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
- Next in thread: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"