|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical)
ATM_Feel_the_Power (joe
net99.net)Tue, 9 May 1995 10:21:10 -0700 (MST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: robert owen thomas: "Re: R. Thomas's NFS question"
- Previous message: Nathan Lawson: "nfs handles/lifetime"
- In reply to: G.J.W. Hagenaars: "Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical)"
- Next in thread: John F. Haugh II: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
Take me off the list as well. Joseph Stroup On Mon, 8 May 1995, G.J.W. Hagenaars wrote: > _please_ take this discussion about impossible/impractical &c offline. > > please. > > > please. > > > > > > please. > > GJ >
- Next message: robert owen thomas: "Re: R. Thomas's NFS question"
- Previous message: Nathan Lawson: "nfs handles/lifetime"
- In reply to: G.J.W. Hagenaars: "Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical)"
- Next in thread: John F. Haugh II: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"