|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: impossible vs. impractical
John F. Haugh II (jfh
rpp386.cactus.org)Wed, 10 May 95 22:46:14 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: cmcurtin
clipper.cb.att.com: "Re: password backdoors"
- Previous message: Paul Szabo: "Re: password backdoors"
- In reply to: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
- Next in thread: jon: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
> > Oh good. I think possibility has practicality implied. After all, if you > > can generate an infinite amount of energy, you CAN go the speed of light > > (according to the current laws of physics), so there, it's not impossible. > > But according to current physics, there is a finite amount of total > energy in the Universe, and thus it is impossible to get the infinite > energy required to do this - again, impossible, not infeasible. I seem to have found a bug in my elm mailer. Isn't there supposed to be some way to get rid of mail on a subject you are no longer interested in without having to press the "d" key every time? Would someone please help me fix this bug? -- John F. Haugh II [ NRA-ILA ] [ Kill Barney ] !'s: ...!cs.utexas.edu!rpp386!jfh Ma Bell: (512) 251-2151 [GOP][DoF #17][PADI][ENTJ]rpp386.cactus.org
- Next message: cmcurtin
clipper.cb.att.com: "Re: password backdoors"
- Previous message: Paul Szabo: "Re: password backdoors"
- In reply to: Dr. Frederick B. Cohen: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"
- Next in thread: jon: "Re: impossible vs. impractical"