|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability
Dan Thorson (Dan_Thorson
notes.seagate.com)Tue, 15 Aug 1995 15:58:48 EDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Sam Quigley: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- Previous message: Aleph One: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- Maybe in reply to: Scott Chasin: "BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Aleph One: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
Michael said: > I tried this attack on /usr/bin/ps and /usr/ucb/ps, and it > works on both of them. This makes me think that more than > just solaris 2.x machines are vulnerable (depending on the > /tmp sticky bit). I did a little poking around myself. SunOS 4.x's "ps": isn't suid root doesn't open any file in /tmp and even if it did, /tmp has the sticky bit set So only SunOS 5.x seems involved insofar as SunOS is concerned. I checked my HP's, and their ps is also not suid root, so they should be safe. True? dct
- Next message: Sam Quigley: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- Previous message: Aleph One: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- Maybe in reply to: Scott Chasin: "BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Aleph One: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"