|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability
System Administrator (root
iifeak.swan.ac.uk)Fri, 18 Aug 1995 16:10:44 +0100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Arve Kjoelen: "BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x"
- Previous message: David Rukshin: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- In reply to: Casper Dik: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Darren Reed: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
> Just to add my two cents to the discussion: > - this is a known problem So why wasn't it more publically announced. Sun could easily have issued a new binary very publically and without saying what they had fixed. > - it is fixed in 2.5 (by using fchown, not chown, both versions of ps) So why didnt you tell people instead of negligently leaving them exposed > - it only affects people that either: > - use tmpfs (default) and don't modifiy it +t themselves > - or us a filesystem for /tmp and didn't do a +t as well. Otherwise known as the majority of people who are less technically clued up. Vendors need to improve their methods. Alan
- Next message: Arve Kjoelen: "BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x"
- Previous message: David Rukshin: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- In reply to: Casper Dik: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Darren Reed: "Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability"