|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Livingston bugs...
Bret McDanel (bret
real.com)Tue, 12 Sep 1995 21:12:21 GMT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Jay 'Whip' Grizzard: "Re: Livingston bugs..."
- Previous message: Mike A Lyons: "Re: Livingston bugs..."
- Maybe in reply to: Jay 'Whip' Grizzard: "Livingston bugs..."
- Next in thread: Jay 'Whip' Grizzard: "Re: Livingston bugs..."
> Another solution is to change the telnet port for the PM. Its not a > permanent solution, but it would stop those would-be crackers that just try > to telnet to the PM, not knowing the correct port number. > That is not a solution.. Portscanning is way to easy, and popular.. everyone has a scanner, everyone uses a scanner.. Changing the port would just make it so that they would scan for what is there.. Only delay it by a second or two.. The real solution is to remove all such backdoors.. I dont recall about EVER reading about this in the documentation on the router.. If this is in there, what else is there? Is there a back door that would give someone root on the router?
- Next message: Jay 'Whip' Grizzard: "Re: Livingston bugs..."
- Previous message: Mike A Lyons: "Re: Livingston bugs..."
- Maybe in reply to: Jay 'Whip' Grizzard: "Livingston bugs..."
- Next in thread: Jay 'Whip' Grizzard: "Re: Livingston bugs..."