|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Urgent !! Serious Linux Security Bug....
Alan Cox (coxa
cableol.net)Mon, 21 Oct 1996 09:26:04 +0100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Kristian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hntopp?=: "What about smbmount? (was: [linux-security] ncpmount/ncpumount)"
- Previous message: Jared Mauch: "Re: BoS: Urgent !! Serious Linux Security Bug...."
- In reply to: James Cisco: "Re: Urgent !! Serious Linux Security Bug...."
- Next in thread: Chris Townsend: "Re: Urgent !! Serious Linux Security Bug...."
> >On the Linux machine, you need to be running kernel version 2.0.7(It's > >the > >lowest we run) up to version 2.0.20(The highest we're running). > > Actually, I'm running 2.1.1 and it works on that as well... It seems to work rather nicely on Digital Unix (some revisions), AIX, Linux 2.0.x and Linux 2.1.x - has anyone tried it on NT ? Ironically its a well known problem that is tested by the ip_send tool. It just happened that the test tool I used didnt construct a packet with a useful IP protocol field and it thus never hit the layer of code that can't handle forged big packets. As well as the patch quoted there is a slightly newer revision that also happens to log who tried to blow up your computer. Alan
- Next message: Kristian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hntopp?=: "What about smbmount? (was: [linux-security] ncpmount/ncpumount)"
- Previous message: Jared Mauch: "Re: BoS: Urgent !! Serious Linux Security Bug...."
- In reply to: James Cisco: "Re: Urgent !! Serious Linux Security Bug...."
- Next in thread: Chris Townsend: "Re: Urgent !! Serious Linux Security Bug...."