|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Suspicion denied
Nathan Lawson (nlawson
kdat.csc.calpoly.edu)Tue, 22 Oct 1996 07:47:09 -0700
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Darren Reed: "Re: Suspicion about denial of service attacks possible on IP."
- Previous message: Keith Bostic: "Re: Suspicion about denial of service attacks possible on IP."
- In reply to: Henrik P Johnson: "Suspicion about denial of service attacks possible on IP."
- Next in thread: Darren Reed: "Re: Suspicion about denial of service attacks possible on IP."
Henrik said: > I was idly reading through Internetworking with TCP/IP yesterday when it > hit me what might be a possible denial of service attack on IP stacks. What > would happen if a host was bombarded with faked fragments of large IP > packages. Would > the stack allocate more and more memory trying to reconstruct the packages or > do they operate with a fixed/max size limit on memory allocated for IP > defragmentation? No. At the very least, ip_drain() is called when the kernel needs more memory and its first task is to drop all fragments. General request: Please desist with the silly ping ramblings. -- Nate Lawson "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of CPE Senior evil to one who is striking at the root." CSL Admin -- Henry David Thoreau, 'Walden', 1854
- Next message: Darren Reed: "Re: Suspicion about denial of service attacks possible on IP."
- Previous message: Keith Bostic: "Re: Suspicion about denial of service attacks possible on IP."
- In reply to: Henrik P Johnson: "Suspicion about denial of service attacks possible on IP."
- Next in thread: Darren Reed: "Re: Suspicion about denial of service attacks possible on IP."