|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Security Problems in XMCD 2.1
Alan Cox (alan
lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)Wed, 27 Nov 1996 20:10:35 +0000
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: itudps: "Re: BOOTP/DHCP security"
- Previous message: itudps: "Re: BOOTP/DHCP security"
- In reply to: Jim Dennis: "Re: Security Problems in XMCD 2.1"
- Next in thread: repayne
jeeves.net: "Re: Security Problems in XMCD 2.1"
> However, what attracted me to this package > was the optional MD5 check on your binary after > the ACL is verified and before the su/execution. Better I think to alter your OS binary loader so that it looks for an extra ELF 'MD5 signed' tag and checks it against a kernel specific key you load. Any binary not matching it thats run uid < somevalue just doesnt run setuid. I'd be tempted to extend that to doesnt run so you had only a small subset of root runnable as root binaries. Alan
- Next message: itudps: "Re: BOOTP/DHCP security"
- Previous message: itudps: "Re: BOOTP/DHCP security"
- In reply to: Jim Dennis: "Re: Security Problems in XMCD 2.1"
- Next in thread: repayne
jeeves.net: "Re: Security Problems in XMCD 2.1"