|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: BOOTP/DHCP security
Alan Cox (alan
lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)Wed, 27 Nov 1996 20:07:38 +0000
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Digital FW2.0 question"
- Previous message: Benedikt Stockebrand: "Re: BOOTP/DHCP security"
- In reply to: itudps: "BOOTP/DHCP security"
- Next in thread: Jon Peatfield: "Re: A security issue of a different kind."
> So what solutions have other people thought about/implemented to cope with > the possibility of rogue address discovery servers being set up? Since > the requests are broadcast, and OS+daemon can fit on a floppy disk in some > cases and is just a free add-on in others, it is very easy to offer back It is worse than this. Just 'borrow' the address of a Windows95 box and ping it. There are also some very interesting other tricks. A dhcp response to all the macs I've tried with a 0 second lifetime locks the mac solid. The concept is old though. The first every Linux appletalk application was a program that stopped macintoys booting anywhere on the lan by owning every appletalk address. > This is particularly relevant to the relatively small number of sites that > do a lot of remoteboot for security reasons (see Some of those are very very hard. Assuming you have IPv6 and a router key in your own persistent storage you are ok (and IPv6 will have a lot of dynamic config). However if you have no key the problem of finding who to talk to in order to kick things off appears insoluble as their is no way to build a trusted path. Another incredibly vulnerable area given this lan access is bridges. They all talk 802.1 spanning tree to remove loops. It lets you do stuff like turn ports off. 802.1 has no security, no crypto nothing, no logging nothing at all. Many tools like SNMP tools and packet sniffers dont even understand 802.1. Alan
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Digital FW2.0 question"
- Previous message: Benedikt Stockebrand: "Re: BOOTP/DHCP security"
- In reply to: itudps: "BOOTP/DHCP security"
- Next in thread: Jon Peatfield: "Re: A security issue of a different kind."