|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Netscape Referer header considered harmful?
Eric Murray (ericm
LNE.COM)Wed, 6 Aug 1997 12:47:49 -0700
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Crewdson, Andy: "Re: Netscape Referer header considered harmful?"
- Previous message: Eric Allman: "Re: sendmail -C: Known? Patches? (AIX 4.1.5)"
- In reply to: Ronald L. Parker: "Netscape Referer header considered harmful?"
- Next in thread: Crewdson, Andy: "Re: Netscape Referer header considered harmful?"
Ronald L. Parker writes: > I found something I consider mildly disturbing while browsing my > referer log stats today. Viewers to our site today have been referred > from the following URLs: > > file:///Hard%20Disk/System%20Folder/Preferences/Netscape%20%C4/Bookmar > s.html > file:C:\NETSCAPE\COMM\PROGRAM\USERS\DEFAULT\BOOKMARK.HTM > file:///molly's%20bookmarks/molly's%20bookmarks > > As you can see, this is a cross-platform problem. What I don't know > is whether these were sent by people just picking the bookmark from > the dropdown or by people using their bookmarks file as a home page. > Not having Communicator myself, and not planning to get it any time > soon, I can't test this. In any case, file: URLs should be private. [why leaking Referrer is bad] Check out my 'cookie jar' program. It blocks cookies, ads and Referrer (and it'll lie about User-Agent if you wish). http://www.lne.com/ericm/cookie_jar/ -- Eric Murray Chief Security Scientist N*Able Technologies www.nabletech.com (email: ericm at lne.com or nabletech.com) PGP keyid:E03F65E5
- Next message: Crewdson, Andy: "Re: Netscape Referer header considered harmful?"
- Previous message: Eric Allman: "Re: sendmail -C: Known? Patches? (AIX 4.1.5)"
- In reply to: Ronald L. Parker: "Netscape Referer header considered harmful?"
- Next in thread: Crewdson, Andy: "Re: Netscape Referer header considered harmful?"