|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: CPSR #8: identd Denial of Service
Phillip R. Jaenke (prj
nls.net)Sat, 9 Aug 1997 11:07:07 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Eric Allman: "Re: sendmail -C: Known? Patches? (AIX 4.1.5)"
- Previous message: Paul H. Hargrove: "Xdm/chooser seurity problems"
- Maybe in reply to: Corinne Posse Releases: "CPSR #8: identd Denial of Service"
A coworker forwarded this announcement to me, and in less than 24 hours, I had an idea for a fix. Yesterday, I tested it. The following fix DOES work against this attack to some extent. There's a temporary fix for the identd DOS attack available at www.nthelp.com/prj/identd.html right now. It does NOT fix the socket problem. It does, however, fix the problem of some machines giving identd all CPU. The fix uses tcpwrappers to deny the REPLY. It does NOT deny the connection. I'm still working on that, and will hopefully have a fixed version of identd available within a week. Please note that the only real socket problem I can see is running out of sockets, which I have a hard time believing is possible. If you had enough bandwith on both ends, and enough time, you COULD run the machine out of sockets, but I can't think of anyone that crazy. ;) George and myself have tested this fix on my personal machine, using a somewhat large attack. Sockets DID remain open. However, system load never went above 0.05. The identd daemon STILL will loop, and you may need to HUP inetd to get it running again, but this WILL prevent the CPU on your machine from being eaten. Just so you know, here's what I'm aiming for in the quick yet complete fix; if in.identd: ALL or a host exists in tcpwrappers, the connection is refused, instead of just the reply. Refusing the connection WILL fix the socket problem. In the long run (a few weeks) I hope to have a version of identd WITHOUT the socket problem, as well as the feature I mentioned above. I'd have it sooner, but, as you can see by my sig, I don't get much free time, and somehow, I don't think I can pass it off as work-related. ;) -Phillip R. Jaenke (InterNIC Handle: PRJ5) [prjNLS.NET] UNIX Systems Administration, Management, and Technical Support, NetLink Services, Inc. (216/468.5100 - sales
nls.net - www.nls.net) "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds -RC5- Team Nightmare (ARRRRRRRRGH!! We lost our webserver. AGAIN!) Linux SkyHawk.dwaggy.org 2.0.29 #55 Mon Aug 3 13:47:21 EDT 1997 i486 fXm
- Next message: Eric Allman: "Re: sendmail -C: Known? Patches? (AIX 4.1.5)"
- Previous message: Paul H. Hargrove: "Xdm/chooser seurity problems"
- Maybe in reply to: Corinne Posse Releases: "CPSR #8: identd Denial of Service"