|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: stealth port scanning
Alan Cox (alan
LXORGUK.UKUU.ORG.UK)Mon, 8 Sep 1997 19:16:44 +0100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Duncan Simpson: "Re: stealth port scanning"
- Previous message: Thamer Al-Herbish: "Re: sleath port scanning fix"
- In reply to: Fyodor: "Re: stealth port scanning"
- Next in thread: Duncan Simpson: "Re: stealth port scanning"
> The idea is that closed ports tend to reply to your FIN packet with the > proper RST. Open ports, on the other hand, tend to ignore the packet in > question. This is a bug in TCP implementations [...] Which is not quite right. Its the way the protocol is defined. Worse still a FIN to a listening port in itself is legitimate for some TCP close down paths. You have to ignore the out of sequence FIN for the protocol to work and you have to RST it for connection close down to work. Its perhaps about time people worked harder on secure machines so scanning doesn't matter. With a good grasp of tcp and a lot of paper I think you could formally prove a scanner has to work. BTW bored folks might be interested in the other stuff I've been playing with, "Good Times" is alive and well and works even better on usenet. Using the netscape and ie3/4 bugs and news articles Content-type: text/html you can it turns out replicate all the attacks across usenet. Next question to be resolved - can you run java applets fro news:<articleid> urls, if so has anyone got a java applet to do the inn hack ... ?
- Next message: Duncan Simpson: "Re: stealth port scanning"
- Previous message: Thamer Al-Herbish: "Re: sleath port scanning fix"
- In reply to: Fyodor: "Re: stealth port scanning"
- Next in thread: Duncan Simpson: "Re: stealth port scanning"