|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Ulrich Flegel's SSH/X11 "vulnerability"
Alan Cox (alan
LXORGUK.UKUU.ORG.UK)Fri, 3 Oct 1997 21:18:54 +0100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Eivind Eklund: "Re: Possible weakness in LPD protocol"
- Previous message: John W. Temples: "Re: TCPwrappers race condition"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: Ulrich Flegel's SSH/X11 "vulnerability""
- Next in thread: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group: "Re: Ulrich Flegel's SSH/X11 "vulnerability""
> > provides a major security improvement by not sending the authorization > > cookie or the X11 packets in the clear. > > For increased security, the XFree86 Xnest server can be used to protect > your display. For example: > > Xnest :2 ; xterm -display :2 -e slogin -l username remotehost Xnest isnt ideal and there is a better system available now. XFree86 3.3 supports the Broadway extensions, and one aspect of that is the ability to partition X clients into groups. It's used to do things like run untrusted X apps in netscape plugins. Each group has its own xauth and they can share information. Have a look at xrx and Xsecurity in the X11R6.3 build tree. In theory ssh could make use of the Xsecurity features. Alan
- Next message: Eivind Eklund: "Re: Possible weakness in LPD protocol"
- Previous message: John W. Temples: "Re: TCPwrappers race condition"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: Ulrich Flegel's SSH/X11 "vulnerability""
- Next in thread: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group: "Re: Ulrich Flegel's SSH/X11 "vulnerability""