|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: HP Laserjet 4M Plus DirectJet Problem
Darren Reed (avalon
COOMBS.ANU.EDU.AU)Sun, 5 Oct 1997 13:45:33 +1000
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Thamer Al-Herbish: "Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets"
- Previous message: Wojciech Tryc: "Solaris 2.6 and sockets"
- In reply to: Klaus Steding-Jessen: "HP Laserjet 4M Plus DirectJet Problem"
- Next in thread: Bill Paul: "Re: HP Laserjet 4M Plus DirectJet Problem"
In some mail from Klaus Steding-Jessen, sie said: [...] > Anyone can confirm this with other printers? I think HP 5M is > also vulnerable, but I've not tested. They are. All the HP printers which can be configured for TCP/IP have this `feature', I think. Actually, if you look at the print filters installed by the JetDirect software, you'll see that they actually use those ports to deliver documents to. Ports 9099 and 9100 would appear to fall into the "undocumented feature" category, although they're very easily discovered. However, the telnet feature is a definate problem, as anyone can login to the printer and (re)configure it. Hmmm, if postscript allowed you to make arbitary TCP/IP connections, you'd even be able to run a portscan (and more!) from the printer :-) Darren
- Next message: Thamer Al-Herbish: "Re: Solaris 2.6 and sockets"
- Previous message: Wojciech Tryc: "Solaris 2.6 and sockets"
- In reply to: Klaus Steding-Jessen: "HP Laserjet 4M Plus DirectJet Problem"
- Next in thread: Bill Paul: "Re: HP Laserjet 4M Plus DirectJet Problem"