|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Vulnerability in metamail
der Mouse (mouse
RODENTS.MONTREAL.QC.CA)Sat, 25 Oct 1997 19:53:18 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Kev: "Re: Vulnerability in metamail"
- Previous message: Raymond Dijkxhoorn: "SECURITY: metamail update (fwd)"
- Maybe in reply to: Alan Cox: "Vulnerability in metamail"
- Next in thread: Kev: "Re: Vulnerability in metamail"
> For the moment however this one appears to be covered ok by using
> uudecode's -o option to force the output file.
Is metamail something OS-specific? Because if not...
[Jerome] 19> uudecode -o /tmp/flarp
Usage: uudecode [infile]
[Jerome] 20>
[Daily-Planet] 151> uudecode -o /tmp/flarp
uudecode: illegal option -- o
usage: uudecode [file ...]
[Daily-Planet] 152>
> uudecode <$1 -o audio-file
I'd suggest as a somewhat more portable solution,
sed -e '1s/.*/begin 644 audio-file/' < $1 | uudecode
Perhaps the 644 should be something like `expr 666 - \`umask\``.
der Mouse
mouse
rodents.montreal.qc.ca
7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
- Next message: Kev: "Re: Vulnerability in metamail"
- Previous message: Raymond Dijkxhoorn: "SECURITY: metamail update (fwd)"
- Maybe in reply to: Alan Cox: "Vulnerability in metamail"
- Next in thread: Kev: "Re: Vulnerability in metamail"