|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: The overlapping fragment bug
Paul Leach (paulle
MICROSOFT.COM)Fri, 14 Nov 1997 19:54:17 -0800
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Philippe Strauss: "Re: The overlapping fragment bug"
- Previous message: David LeBlanc: "Re: Linux IP fragment overlap bug"
- Maybe in reply to: Alan Cox: "The overlapping fragment bug"
- Next in thread: Philippe Strauss: "Re: The overlapping fragment bug"
July 1, 1997 ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/winnt/winnt-public/fixes/usa/nt40/hotfixes-po stSP3/icmp-fix/ Which is incorporated with other TCP related fixes at: ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/winnt/winnt-public/fixes/usa/nt40/hotfixes-po stSP3/simptcp-fix/ > ---------- > From: Alan Cox[SMTP:alanLXORGUK.UKUU.ORG.UK] > Reply To: Alan Cox > Sent: Friday, November 14, 1997 11:54 AM > To: BUGTRAQ
NETSPACE.ORG > Subject: The overlapping fragment bug > > Well after some testing its quite effective against Linux [fix > available and will be in 2.0.32 as standard], NT, 95, Win 3.11 > and also a couple of others it seems - DOS Novell TCP/IP and > PCNFS 4.0 (reportedly). BSD derived stacks, various routers, Solaris > MacOS and HP/UX all seem fine. > > The actual exploit can also be slightly improved. Make it a tcp frame, > make the destination port 80 and it goes through most firewalls like > a bullet through cheese and seems to keep its effectiveness. > > You can screen the stuff behind a firewall if your firewall reassembles > fragments (and is of course itself not vulnerable 8)). > > Any news on the microsoft fix expected date/times ? > > Alan >
- Next message: Philippe Strauss: "Re: The overlapping fragment bug"
- Previous message: David LeBlanc: "Re: Linux IP fragment overlap bug"
- Maybe in reply to: Alan Cox: "The overlapping fragment bug"
- Next in thread: Philippe Strauss: "Re: The overlapping fragment bug"