|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: SLMail 2.6 DoS - Imail also
Mark Symons (mark.symons
za.eds.com)Tue, 17 Mar 1998 22:28:12 +0200
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Kusche, Klaus: "AIX 4.1.5 DoS attack (aka "Port 1025 problem")"
- Previous message: Daniel Reed: "Re: Another day, another race - lynx 2.7.1"
- Maybe in reply to: Jon: "SLMail 2.6 DoS - Imail also"
There have recently been a couple of messages concerning DoS attacks on NT-based SLMail and IMail SMTP servers. At the end of January, a similar report was made concerning IMail's POP3 server. Jon[SMTP:stevenEFNI.COM] wrote: > A long string of text after a command makes > the program (SLMail) crash. (Snip) > It will stay unresponsive until manually restarted. (Snip) > Out of boredom, I tried another smtp daemon for Windows, > IMail (I tried 4.03) by IPSwitch (www.ipswitch.com). Which > crashed the same way. Pretty strange, I've only tried two > windowsNT smtp daemons, and both crashed the same way... I cannot comment on SLMail, but John Junod (author of IMail) says the following: # That "bug" by the way, doesn't cause IMail any problems. # It only causes the "hacker" a problem since IMail won't # release the connection and won't accept any more input # from them until they drop the connection and reconnect. # It does not affect any other sessions to the SMTP server. # The session does drop cleanly freeing all resources as # designed either when the "hacker" breaks the connection # or when the timeout occurs, whichever occurs first. Mark Symons EDS Africa mark.symons
za.eds.com
- Next message: Kusche, Klaus: "AIX 4.1.5 DoS attack (aka "Port 1025 problem")"
- Previous message: Daniel Reed: "Re: Another day, another race - lynx 2.7.1"
- Maybe in reply to: Jon: "SLMail 2.6 DoS - Imail also"