|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: obsd boot hack (boot-modified-kernel-attack)
Juergen Schmidt (ju
ct.heise.de)Tue, 14 Apr 1998 16:36:19 +0200
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Peter Shipley: "obsd boot hack (boot-modified-kernel-attack)"
- Previous message: Aleph One: "MacOS based buffer overflows..."
- In reply to: Peter Shipley: "obsd boot hack (boot-modified-kernel-attack)"
- Next in thread: Jeff Polk: "Re: obsd boot hack (boot-modified-kernel-attack)"
> Linux systems using LILO to boot are not vulnerable although Sparc > Linux with SILO is vulnerable to a similar "boot-modified-kernel-attack" > unless they are utilize a boot a password in the /etc/silo.conf > configuration file. > (thanks to Jon Paul Nollmann <sinsterdarkwater.com> for Linux Q & A) While it is true that Linux/LILO is not vulnerable to this specific attack, it should be noted, that gaining root on a Linux box via LILO boot-prompt is even easier: you don't even need a modified kernel. Giving an init=/bin/sh as boot parameter invokes the shell instead of init. After executing the necessary init-scripts manually, you have full root-access to the machine. To avoid this, you should add "RESTRICTED" and set a password in your lilo.conf, which is then required to set any boot-options (don't forget, to make /etc/lilo.conf read-only for root, it contains the password in clear text) bye, juergen Juergen Schmidt Redakteur/editor c't magazin Verlag Heinz Heise GmbH & Co KG, Helstorferstr. 7, D-30625 Hannover EMail: ju
ct.heise.de - Tel.: +49 511 5352 300 - FAX: +49 511 5352 417
- Next message: Peter Shipley: "obsd boot hack (boot-modified-kernel-attack)"
- Previous message: Aleph One: "MacOS based buffer overflows..."
- In reply to: Peter Shipley: "obsd boot hack (boot-modified-kernel-attack)"
- Next in thread: Jeff Polk: "Re: obsd boot hack (boot-modified-kernel-attack)"