|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Silly patch to report version.bind requests
Peter Svensson (petersv
DF.LTH.SE)Fri, 12 Jun 1998 20:39:49 +0200
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: LaMont Jones: "Re: Silly patch to report version.bind requests"
- Previous message: tqbf
pobox.com: "Re: Vulnerability in 4.4BSD Secure Levels Implementation"
- In reply to: Craig H. Rowland: "Silly patch to report version.bind requests"
- Next in thread: LaMont Jones: "Re: Silly patch to report version.bind requests"
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Craig H. Rowland wrote: > While I don't suspect this will break anything, I would like to hear if it > does. I've been running the patch without incident, but no guarantees as > usual. On the other hand the version request feature is very much used among dns operators to track down errors. A lot of traffic on the bind mailing lists was regarding how to find out the version number of a remote bind installation. It had proven very helpful to us on many occasions so I hope not too many people will use this patch. Peter -- Peter Svensson ! Pgp key available by finger, fingerprint: <petersvdf.lth.se> ! 8A E9 20 98 C1 FF 43 E3 07 FD B9 0A 80 72 70 AF ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Remember, Luke, your source will be with you... always...
- Next message: LaMont Jones: "Re: Silly patch to report version.bind requests"
- Previous message: tqbf
pobox.com: "Re: Vulnerability in 4.4BSD Secure Levels Implementation"
- In reply to: Craig H. Rowland: "Silly patch to report version.bind requests"
- Next in thread: LaMont Jones: "Re: Silly patch to report version.bind requests"