|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Annex DoS
Matt Carter (matt
saratoga.its.bond.edu.au)Sun, 26 Jul 1998 18:45:44 +1000
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Security warning: Netscape https & proxies"
- Previous message: Mike Zimmerman: "Re: Another NEW mIRC bug and ALL mIRC Exploit patches"
- In reply to: Albert Nubdy: "Annex DoS"
- Next in thread: Bay Networks Technical Support: "Re: Annex DoS"
i made a post about some time ago. a simple 'strobe' will bring a bay terminal server crashing to it's knees. i notified bay years ago .. hell lets go something even simpler. 1 x 32k ping packet ever second at a annex will crush it. so, maybe you have something a bit beefier (i'm looking at micro annex els) fire 2 x 32k packets. gee that was difficult. admittedly, i haven't been up to date on the bay annex stuff, so maybe they fixed it.. but i never eever heard anything back from them so.. On Sat, 25 Jul 1998, Albert Nubdy wrote: > From: Albert Nubdy <formatezEDUREDES.EDU.DO> > To: BUGTRAQ
NETSPACE.ORG > Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 20:10:21 -0400 > Subject: [BUGTRAQ] Annex DoS > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980725200936.6869A-100000
eduredes.edu.do> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Redes2 Security Team > -------------------- > .DO Underground > > > PROBLEM > ======= > > We have found serveral DoS attacks agaisnt Annex terminal servers > from > xylogics(bay). > > > DETAILS > ======= > > The first attack is about the ping program on the webserver. They > designed the /ping program to take only 64 chars in the hostname part. > They avoided from ppl to insert more than 64 by limiting it in the > page on > the webserver (/ping.html). But if you do a : > http://annex.server.here/ping?query=a lot of aaaaaa's here(more than > 64) > then annex server goes BOOM!. > > The second attack is with the land attack. Maybe when they tried the > land attack on the annex servers they thought it didn't work. But it > does... The problem is that when you do 1 land attack the CPU only > rises a > 50 percent. Now if you do 2 land attacks consecutively then the annex > server freezes because the CPU rises to 100%. I didn't make any > programs > for this because you only have to do a shell script that executes your > land program at least two or three times. > > FIX > === > > We notified Bay a month ago. They have not responded yet. > > > Credits: > wh0is, speed1, lizard. > > ========================================| > Albert Nubdy | formatez
eduredes.edu.do | > FormateZ
undernet | > - ----------------------------------------| > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.3i for non-commercial use <http://www.pgpi.com> > > iQA/AwUBNbqefVRmALifgPyqEQIvLACeOPojXC2FqVgsO688XIBGINVNEDMAnR5r > WpUM+RDMkvaCMEmMkzqVNt5h > =HPOk > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Matt Carter | Systems Management Group Email: matt
bond.edu.au | Bond University Phone: +61 7 5595 1423 | University Drive Fax: +61 7 5595 1456 | Robina, QLD 4226
- Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Security warning: Netscape https & proxies"
- Previous message: Mike Zimmerman: "Re: Another NEW mIRC bug and ALL mIRC Exploit patches"
- In reply to: Albert Nubdy: "Annex DoS"
- Next in thread: Bay Networks Technical Support: "Re: Annex DoS"