|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Apache DoS Attack
Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= (dag-erli
IFI.UIO.NO)Wed, 12 Aug 1998 14:08:07 +0200
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Aleph One: "Microsoft Security Bulletin (MS98-008)"
- Previous message: Kari E. Hurtta: "Re: Sendmail up to 8.9.1 - mail.local instroduces new class of"
- In reply to: Jonathan Freeman: "Re: Apache DoS Attack"
- Next in thread: Pim van Riezen: "Re: Apache DoS Attack"
Jonathan Freeman <freemanADHOST.COM> writes: > <> IIS 3.0 (Service Pack 3) > > causes immediate jump to 100% CPU for approx. 5 seconds > multiple attacks can keep the CPU in the 90% range > > <> IIS 4.0 (Service Pack 3) > > causes immediate jump to 80% CPU for approx. a half second > multiple attacks DO NOT cause more thank 40% sustained CPU In other words, they're immune. 80% CPU load for half a second simply means the server is working hard to quaff the request (or drink from a firehose, depending on the value passed to sioux with the -n switch ), but it's not leaking. IIS 3.0 is apparently a bad performer (well, a worse performer than IIS 4.0, anyway) and takes more time to recover. Did you run these tests on the same computer (or at least on ident- ically configured computers)? If not, there is no basis for comparison. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli
ifi.uio.no
- Next message: Aleph One: "Microsoft Security Bulletin (MS98-008)"
- Previous message: Kari E. Hurtta: "Re: Sendmail up to 8.9.1 - mail.local instroduces new class of"
- In reply to: Jonathan Freeman: "Re: Apache DoS Attack"
- Next in thread: Pim van Riezen: "Re: Apache DoS Attack"