|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: specifics on cisco DOS?
Jared Mauch (jared
PUCK.NETHER.NET)Mon, 17 Aug 1998 14:40:39 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Peter W: "Re: Real Audio Server Version 5 bug?"
- Previous message: De_Paddy: "Real Audio Server Version 5 bug?"
- In reply to: Roger Books: "specifics on cisco DOS?"
- Next in thread: George Phillips: "Re: specifics on cisco DOS?"
On Mon, Aug 17, 1998 at 05:43:36PM +0000, Roger Books wrote: > Does anyone have specifics on the latest DoS on cisco routers? > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/ioslogin-pub.shtml > > I have been assigned the task of determining not only if > we are vulnerable, but how difficult it is to perform Vulnerability should be fairly easy to determine via "sh ver" A "good" way to cause this to no longer be an issue for you is to assign inbound-vty access-lists on your routers, such that you can only telnet to them from certain ip addresses, hosts, etc.. Here's an example of your config you would need to insert to your cisco router. access-list 50 permit 10.20.128.0 0.0.63.255 line vty 0 4 access-class 50 in login ! This will allow 10.20.128.0/18 to telnet into your router ONLY. This will also help prevent joe-blow user from the internet to determine your router vendor. (Unless you do something silly like use snmp-server community public, or don't acl your snmp-server community public). A "good thing(tm)" IMHO. For your reference, here's the various subnet masks from one of my cisco-acl programs, so you can do this without problems: Format: cidr, cidr+slash, mask, cisco inverted-mask char lookupnfo[][4][16] = { { "32", "/32", "255.255.255.255", "0.0.0.0" }, {"31", "/31", "255.255.255.254", "0.0.0.1"}, {"30", "/30", "255.255.255.252", "0.0.0.3"}, {"29", "/29", "255.255.255.248", "0.0.0.7"}, {"28", "/28", "255.255.255.240", "0.0.0.15"}, {"27", "/27", "255.255.255.224", "0.0.0.31"}, {"26", "/26", "255.255.255.192", "0.0.0.63"}, {"25", "/25", "225.255.255.128", "0.0.0.127"}, {"24", "/24", "255.255.255.0", "0.0.0.255"}, {"23", "/23", "255.255.254.0", "0.0.1.255"}, {"22", "/22", "255.255.252.0", "0.0.3.255"}, {"21", "/21", "255.255.248.0", "0.0.7.255"}, {"20", "/20", "255.255.240.0", "0.0.15.255"}, {"19", "/19", "255.255.224.0", "0.0.31.255"}, {"18", "/18", "255.255.192.0", "0.0.63.255"}, {"17", "/17", "255.255.128.0", "0.0.127.255"}, {"16", "/16", "255.255.0.0", "0.0.255.255"}, {"15", "/15", "255.254.0.0", "0.1.255.255"}, {"14", "/14", "255.252.0.0", "0.3.255.255"}, {"13", "/13", "255.248.0.0", "0.7.255.255"}, {"12", "/12", "255.240.0.0", "0.15.255.255"}, {"11", "/11", "255.224.0.0", "0.31.255.255"}, {"10", "/10", "255.192.0.0", "0.63.255.255"}, { "9", "/9", "255.128.0.0", "0.127.255.255"}, { "8", "/8", "255.0.0.0", "0.255.255.255"}, { "7", "/7", "254.0.0.0", "1.255.255.255"}, { "6", "/6", "252.0.0.0", "3.255.255.255"}, { "5", "/5", "248.0.0.0", "7.255.255.255"}, { "4", "/4", "240.0.0.0", "15.255.255.255"}, { "3", "/3", "224.0.0.0", "31.255.255.255"}, { "2", "/2", "192.0.0.0", "63.255.255.255"}, { "1", "/1", "128.0.0.0", "127.255.255.255"}, { "0", "/0", "0.0.0.0", "255.255.255.255" } } ; - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jaredpuck.nether.net | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/
- Next message: Peter W: "Re: Real Audio Server Version 5 bug?"
- Previous message: De_Paddy: "Real Audio Server Version 5 bug?"
- In reply to: Roger Books: "specifics on cisco DOS?"
- Next in thread: George Phillips: "Re: specifics on cisco DOS?"