|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: [NTSEC] By-passing MS Proxy 2.0 and others packet filtering
Gus (angus
INTASYS.COM)Tue, 13 Oct 1998 11:18:23 +0100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Serge Pimenov: "Re: Yet more Rconsole."
- Previous message: Mnemonix: "A wee caveat - the freeware WAR-ftp server (most versions)"
- In reply to: Jean-Christophe Touvet: "Re: [NTSEC] By-passing MS Proxy 2.0 and others packet filtering"
- Next in thread: Peter van Dijk: "Re: [NTSEC] By-passing MS Proxy 2.0 and others packet filtering"
So to summarise: "Proxy servers can be abused. Ensure that only authorised users can connect" Exactly how you do this will depend on your circumstances and software. Binding the server to the inward-facing NIC in a 'bastion host' config, ensuring access control features are enabled by default if you are a vendor and blocking inward traffic to proxy port if you run a firewall or filtering router. Perhaps Squid's "X-Forwarded-For: " header is a solution that could be applied for situations where limiting the access to the server is not a viable proposition. A portscanner that bounces through a proxy server, in the style of the ftp 'bounce' attack is at http://www.intasys.com/~angus/pbs.c It goes without saying that 90% of "ftp bounce attack" code will only need very small mods to be used on a WWW proxy. Regards Gus -- angusintasys.com
- Next message: Serge Pimenov: "Re: Yet more Rconsole."
- Previous message: Mnemonix: "A wee caveat - the freeware WAR-ftp server (most versions)"
- In reply to: Jean-Christophe Touvet: "Re: [NTSEC] By-passing MS Proxy 2.0 and others packet filtering"
- Next in thread: Peter van Dijk: "Re: [NTSEC] By-passing MS Proxy 2.0 and others packet filtering"