|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Network Scan Vulnerability [SUMMARY]
dpk (dpk
EGR.MSU.EDU)Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:20:14 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: mnemonix: "MS IIS 4.0 Security Advisory"
- Previous message: Gene Spafford: "Re: Tracing by uid u after root does setuid(u)"
- In reply to: Tomasz Grabowski: "Re: Network Scan Vulnerability [SUMMARY]"
- Next in thread: Kevin Schmidt: "Re: Network Scan Vulnerability [SUMMARY]"
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Tomasz Grabowski wrote: [snip of vulnerable systems] And FORE PowerHub, 7-2.6.3.4-P10. It hangs for about 80 seconds when scanned with nmap -sS -O (nmap V2.00) I posted it to FORE about three weeks ago and never received an answer. BTW: it's not the first time when FORE don't care about such things. About 4 months ago I posted simillar message to them (i described how to make one TCP/IP packet, which will hang PowerHubs) and I received only semi-generated message... nothing else. I think that the problem with nmap now is something very simillar to that one_TCP/IP_packet attack... I passed this along to the Fore Engineers in my area. They took it seriously and replied back that Powerhub Software 5.0.1 (11193) fixes the problems relating to nmap, as well as cheops/queso scans. Fyi, Dennis -- Dennis Kelly <dpkegr.msu.edu> Network Adminstrator College of Engineering, MSU
- Next message: mnemonix: "MS IIS 4.0 Security Advisory"
- Previous message: Gene Spafford: "Re: Tracing by uid u after root does setuid(u)"
- In reply to: Tomasz Grabowski: "Re: Network Scan Vulnerability [SUMMARY]"
- Next in thread: Kevin Schmidt: "Re: Network Scan Vulnerability [SUMMARY]"