|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: ICQ99 crash
Joe Stewart (bugtraq
HTTPTECH.COM)Tue, 16 Feb 1999 21:07:30 GMT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Christian Antkow: "Website Pro v2.0 (NT) Configuration Issues"
- Previous message: Security Research Labs: "NAI Security Advisory: Vulnerability in NFR 2.0.2-Research"
- In reply to: Eric J. Stevens: "Re: ICQ99 crash"
- Next in thread: Timothy Doane: "Re: ICQ99 crash"
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 08:06:47 -0500, you wrote: >I think you should be aware that ICQ99 is a BETA release. IT IS NOT >INTENDED FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC. Do not report the bug to Bugtraq, >but instead, do what you agreed to when downloading ICQ99, report it to >ICQ so that they can fix the bug in the general release. That's the >purpose of BETA. Ordinarily I'd say that's a good rule, but ICQ is an exception to the rule IMHO. Let's not kid ourselves, ICQ _is_ in widespread use by the general public. It's been in a perpetual beta stage since its release and there doesn't seem to be a commercial release in sight. This is not your average beta program. Security flaws and bugs in this program can affect millions of users, and I think that deserves to be addressed on Bugtraq. -Joe
- Next message: Christian Antkow: "Website Pro v2.0 (NT) Configuration Issues"
- Previous message: Security Research Labs: "NAI Security Advisory: Vulnerability in NFR 2.0.2-Research"
- In reply to: Eric J. Stevens: "Re: ICQ99 crash"
- Next in thread: Timothy Doane: "Re: ICQ99 crash"