|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability
Subject: Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability
From: Eivind Eklund (eivind
FREEBSD.ORG)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2000 - 04:36:39 CST
- Next message: Ron Parker: "Re: SAS behavior in Windows NT - RE: Windows 2000 Run As... Feature"
- Previous message: Peter Berendi: "Re: SAS behavior in Windows NT - RE: Windows 2000 Run As... Feature"
- In reply to: Steve VanDevender: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Jordan Ritter: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Brandon Palmer: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Dug Song: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Reply: Eivind Eklund: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Reply: Jordan Ritter: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 11:53:05AM -0800, Steve VanDevender wrote:
> Ultimately I wonder how much of a future S/Key has now that SSH and
> similar utilities are widely deployed and provide much more
> sophisticated protections, especially session encryption.
S/key is still useful, even when you do use SSH. By using S/Key, you
can avoid replay attacks if somebody compromise a workstation or
temporarily compromise the server (ie, you are secure after reinstall
and moving skeykeys over.)
You don't get the same effect by using ssh RSA authentication, partly
you either have
(1) Users that key in the passphrase each time they connect to the
server
OR
(2) Agent forwarding, which means that if any computer they have an
account on is compromised, so is your box. Without any logging in
their end. Without any *possibility* of proper logging in their
end, as the authentication challenges do not themselves contain
any authentication.
OR
(3) Extremely clued users, who either remember to type -a on all ssh
connections, don't have agent forwarding at all (disabled for the
machine), or has patched ssh to add the -A keyword (now default
included in Debian, and possibly in OpenSSH)
Eivind.
- Next message: Ron Parker: "Re: SAS behavior in Windows NT - RE: Windows 2000 Run As... Feature"
- Previous message: Peter Berendi: "Re: SAS behavior in Windows NT - RE: Windows 2000 Run As... Feature"
- In reply to: Steve VanDevender: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Jordan Ritter: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Brandon Palmer: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Dug Song: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Reply: Eivind Eklund: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Reply: Jordan Ritter: "Re: S/Key & OPIE Database Vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Thu Jan 27 2000 - 14:13:14 CST