|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: CyberCop Monitor NT 2.5
From: dr_erik_wright
GMX.NETDate: Tue May 23 2000 - 18:51:12 CDT
- Next message: Pedro Quintanilha: "Re: RFP2K05: NetProwler vs. RFProwler"
- Previous message: rpc: "infosrch.cgi 'interactive' shell"
- Next in thread: Robert Graham: "Re: CyberCop Monitor NT 2.5"
- Reply: Robert Graham: "Re: CyberCop Monitor NT 2.5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
While playing with whisker's IDS evasion features, I determined that some
of the techniques employed are effective against Cybercop Monitor 2.5 on the
Windows NT platform.
This came as a great surprise to me since my company chose this product
because of the IDS evasion paper that Network Associates released a few years
ago. They don't seem to practice what they preach, just like every other
commercial security solution.
After doing some searching, I noticed that ISS Realsecure had a similar
problem that was reported on bugtraq a few months ago.
Thanks a bunch ISS and Network Associates.
-- Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net
- Next message: Pedro Quintanilha: "Re: RFP2K05: NetProwler vs. RFProwler"
- Previous message: rpc: "infosrch.cgi 'interactive' shell"
- Next in thread: Robert Graham: "Re: CyberCop Monitor NT 2.5"
- Reply: Robert Graham: "Re: CyberCop Monitor NT 2.5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]