|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Microsoft Outlook (Express) bug..
From: Frederik Lindberg (fred
CHEETAHMAIL.COM)Date: Sun Jun 11 2000 - 13:07:51 CDT
- Next message: arkth: "Re: Piranha password file"
- Previous message: Ussr Labs: "Remote DoS attack in Networks Associates PGP Certificate Server Version 2.5 Vulnerability"
- In reply to: Elias Levy: "Re: Microsoft Outlook (Express) bug.."
- Reply: Frederik Lindberg: "Re: Microsoft Outlook (Express) bug.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:57:16 -0700, Elias Levy wrote:
>Travis Ogdon <togdon
easystreet.com>:
>
>This is also true for all messages with the following invalid headers:
>
>Return-Path: <>
This is a valid header for [double-]bounces, added at the time of final
delivery, in this case the POP3/IMAP server when the envelope sender is
NULL. See rfc1123:
5.2.13 RFC-822 Message Specification: RFC-822 Section 4
The syntax shown for the Return-path line omits the
possibility
of a null return path, which is used to prevent looping of
error notifications (see Section 5.3.3). The complete syntax
is:
return = "Return-path" ":" route-addr
/ "Return-path" ":" "<" ">"
The set of optional header fields is hereby expanded to
include
the Content-Type field defined in RFC-1049 [SMTP:7]. This
field "allows mail reading systems to automatically identify
the type of a structured message body and to process it for
display accordingly". [SMTP:7] A User Agent MAY support this
field.
-- Fred
Frederik Lindberg, CTO, CheetahMail
- Next message: arkth: "Re: Piranha password file"
- Previous message: Ussr Labs: "Remote DoS attack in Networks Associates PGP Certificate Server Version 2.5 Vulnerability"
- In reply to: Elias Levy: "Re: Microsoft Outlook (Express) bug.."
- Reply: Frederik Lindberg: "Re: Microsoft Outlook (Express) bug.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]