|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: NAI WebShield SMTP does not scan base64 encoding
From: chris.paget
ANALYSYS.COMDate: Tue Jun 20 2000 - 13:52:28 CDT
- Next message: Juancho Forlanda: "BlackICE by Network ICE Corp vulnerability against Back Orifice 1.2"
- Previous message: Jeff Licquia: "CUPS DoS Bugs"
- In reply to: Fronck, Destry: "Re: NAI WebShield SMTP does not scan base64 encoding"
- Next in thread: Sato, Ken: "Re: NAI WebShield SMTP does not scan base64 encoding"
- Reply: chris.paget
ANALYSYS.COM: "Re: NAI WebShield SMTP does not scan base64 encoding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MS-TNEF is not used at any point in the process; neither is Outlook,
nor Rich Text. The messages are plain text (a renamed copy of my
autoexec.bat) being sent using Forte Agent - nothing Microsoft. The
MIME types I have tried include application/octet-stream and
text/plain - in neither case is the VBS / SHS file blocked. The only
difference that I can see between this setup and another machine using
Outlook (from which messages get blocked) is the encoding type -
base64 instead of 8bit.
If the attachment is indeed a known virus, it appears to be detected
and cleaned; however, I am trying to block ALL potentially malicious
attachments, and base64 encoding appears to circumvent those checks.
Chris
-- Chris Paget Software Engineer, Analysys LTD.chris.paget
analysys.com mad.nutter
mindless.com
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:37:46 -0400, you wrote:
>Chris, >This problem is not caused by base64 encoding. It is caused by the message >being encoded in MS-TNEF (Microsoft Transport Neutral Encapsulation Format.) >and then getting base64 encoded. MS-TNEF is used when Outlook sends Rich >Text information over the Internet. > >NAI knows that this is a problem but they have been unable to fix it. Here's >my message to NAI and their response. >------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 7:55 PM > To: Fronck, Destry > Subject: RE: Webshield smtp 4.03 virus gateway > > Destry, > > I talked to the Webshield guys and they said you are >completely correct. Not only that but NO company can scan those files >including ours. They did provide an article that may be of help to you. > > <<WebShield_MS-TNEF.doc>> > > Thanks > > > Jon > -------------------------------------- > Network Associates > Who's watching your network? > ------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fronck, Destry >[mailto:DFronck
FDIC.gov] > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 7:38 AM > To: Jon > Cc: FDIC-CSIRT > Subject: Webshield smtp 4.03 virus >gateway > Importance: High > > Jon, I have discovered a problem with the >WebShield smtp 4.03 virus gateway for NT. We have had several instances of >the ILOVEYOU virus getting past the virus gateway. All of these were >detected by the VShield 4.03 desktop scanner. Both products are running the >same dat files; 4076 and the latest extra.dat. > > The problem is that the gateway does not >appear to scan MS-TNEF (Microsoft Transport Neutral Encapsulated Format) >content. This content is typically encapsulated in MIME like so > > ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFB8C1.7FC25C8A > Content-Type: application/ms-tnef > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > > Can you verify this? > Does WebShield 4.5 fix this? Can you verify >this? > > Thanks, > Destry Fronck >----------------------------------------------- >Thanks, > Destry Fronck > >-----Original Message----- >From: chris.paget
ANALYSYS.COM [mailto:chris.paget
ANALYSYS.COM] >Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 9:08 AM >To: BUGTRAQ
SECURITYFOCUS.COM >Subject: NAI WebShield SMTP does not scan base64 encoding > >While investigating todays virus outbreak (Stages.Worm), I noticed >that our email virus scanner (NAI WebShield SMTP 4.5, engine 4.0.50, >DAT 4.0.4082, 14/06/00) was not picking up all attachments. >The server is configured to block all SHS, VBS, etc attachments, and >notify the sender. However, when these are sent as Base64 encoding >(rather than 8-bit), they are passed by the server, and could >potentially infect the network. 8-bit attachments are successfully >scanned (and blocked if necessary). > >Chirs
- Next message: Juancho Forlanda: "BlackICE by Network ICE Corp vulnerability against Back Orifice 1.2"
- Previous message: Jeff Licquia: "CUPS DoS Bugs"
- In reply to: Fronck, Destry: "Re: NAI WebShield SMTP does not scan base64 encoding"
- Next in thread: Sato, Ken: "Re: NAI WebShield SMTP does not scan base64 encoding"
- Reply: chris.paget
ANALYSYS.COM: "Re: NAI WebShield SMTP does not scan base64 encoding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]