|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Security hole in Win2K's FTP server
From: Bob Kline (bkline
RKSYSTEMS.COM)Date: Fri Jul 14 2000 - 21:03:45 CDT
- Next message: Elias Levy: "Administrivia: LISTSERV downtime"
- Previous message: Ben Greenbaum: "Re: Security hole in Win2K's FTP server"
- In reply to: Ben Greenbaum: "Re: Security hole in Win2K's FTP server"
- Next in thread: Dan Kaminsky: "Re: Security hole in Win2K's FTP server"
- Reply: Bob Kline: "Re: Security hole in Win2K's FTP server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Ben Greenbaum wrote:
> However, it is documented and works as intended, so I don't think it
> can be considered a bug.
Perhaps, depending on how much you want to distinguish security
deficiencies from bugs, and whether you consider the online help
(providing detailed instructions for a security feature which does
*not* work) to be part of the documentation. My own view is that
when a software product does not behave as described by the
instructions which accompany it, that is a bug.
-- Bob Kline mailto:bklinerksystems.com http://www.rksystems.com
- Next message: Elias Levy: "Administrivia: LISTSERV downtime"
- Previous message: Ben Greenbaum: "Re: Security hole in Win2K's FTP server"
- In reply to: Ben Greenbaum: "Re: Security hole in Win2K's FTP server"
- Next in thread: Dan Kaminsky: "Re: Security hole in Win2K's FTP server"
- Reply: Bob Kline: "Re: Security hole in Win2K's FTP server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]