|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack
From: Hiroaki Etoh (ETOH
JP.IBM.COM)Date: Wed Aug 09 2000 - 04:59:49 CDT
- Next message: debian-security-announce
LISTS.DEBIAN.ORG: "[SECURITY] New version of mailx released"
- Previous message: Dunker, Noah: "Re: (debian) Re: suidperl; more"
- Next in thread: John Viega: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- Reply: John Viega: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- Reply: Hiroaki Etoh: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- Reply: der Mouse: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have been investigating a machine-independent change to GCC that
would generate code to protect applications from stack-smashing attacks.
The main characteristics are low performance overhead of the protection
code, protecting against different varieties of stack-smashing attacks,
and supporting various processors. A research report is ready on
the web (http://www.trl.ibm.co.jp/projects/security/propolice).
I would like some feedback whether it is worth pursuing getting it
assigned to the FSF for inclusion in GCC.
--- Hiroaki Etoh, Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Japan
- Next message: debian-security-announce
LISTS.DEBIAN.ORG: "[SECURITY] New version of mailx released"
- Previous message: Dunker, Noah: "Re: (debian) Re: suidperl; more"
- Next in thread: John Viega: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- Reply: John Viega: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- Reply: Hiroaki Etoh: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- Reply: der Mouse: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]