|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Identifying SUN Solaris Machines using ICMP Address Mask
From: Darren Reed (avalon
COOMBS.ANU.EDU.AU)Date: Wed Aug 09 2000 - 20:48:02 CDT
- Next message: Mike Schiffman: "Remote vulnerability in Gopherd 2.x"
- Previous message: John Viega: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- In reply to: Peter J . Holzer: "Re: Identifying SUN Solaris Machines using ICMP Address Mask Requests with a little twist"
- Reply: Darren Reed: "Re: Identifying SUN Solaris Machines using ICMP Address Mask"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In some mail from Peter J . Holzer, sie said:
>
> > [rootaik icmp]# ./sing -mask -c 2 -F 8 IP_Address
> > SINGing to IP_Address (IP_Address): 12 data bytes
> > 12 bytes from IP_Address: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 mask=0.0.0.0
> > 12 bytes from IP_Address: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 mask=0.0.0.0
> >
> > --- IP_Address sing statistics ---
> > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
>
> HP-UX 11.00 behaves exactly the same.
Amusing but not as strange as it seems because both share their
TCP/IP STREAMS lineage with the same third party crowd (Mentat).
Darren
- Next message: Mike Schiffman: "Remote vulnerability in Gopherd 2.x"
- Previous message: John Viega: "Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack"
- In reply to: Peter J . Holzer: "Re: Identifying SUN Solaris Machines using ICMP Address Mask Requests with a little twist"
- Reply: Darren Reed: "Re: Identifying SUN Solaris Machines using ICMP Address Mask"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]