I don't think the behavior should change because of DSR. DSR is more useful
than 'rightness' in my opinion. A switch to turn it off if you don't want it is
something I'd advocate, but the default should be 'on'.

--Perry

On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 06:18:33PM -0800, ddowneymail.hislinuxbox.net wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Perry Harrington wrote:
>
> > In short, yes security through obscurity is dumb, but calling for people to change
> > this functionality is unwarranted when machines can be firewalled.
> >
>
>
> Actually to me this sounds more like an excuse NOT to fix the problem
> simply because it's "industry standard".
>
> Sometimes standards need to be looked at and revamped. In this case it's
> one that would affect the industry as a whole. Are you calling for
> advisories only simply because the workload would be tremendous or because
> you truly believe that fixing this would affect nothing?
>
>
> ---
> David D.W. Downey - RHCE
> Consulting Engineer
> Ensim Corporation
> david.downeyensim.com
>
>

--
Perry Harrington                 Director of                   zelur xuniL  ()
perry at webcom dot com      System Architecture               Think Blue.  /\

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6pE64fK7Bvd0wfuURAu82AKCPYODPjUjh3oBDgPujYDSvEU/RYgCfbK3o VWGeGmN3ExAzVrmNi4jR6mo= =8VsT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]