In article <20010513200734.9834.qmailfiver.freemessage.com>,
zenith_parsecthe-astronaut.com wrote:
>========================================================
>Vulnerable systems: redhat 7.0 with man-1.5h1-10 (default
>package) and earlier.
>=========================================================
>Heap Based Overflow of man via -S option gives GID man.
>
>Due to a slight error in a length check, the -S option to
>man can cause a buffer overflow on the heap, allowing redirection of
>execution into user supplied code.
>
>man -S `perl -e 'print ":" x 100'`
>
>Will cause a seg fault if you are vulnerable.

With the name of a man page as an additional argument, the version of
man-db shipped with Debian GNU/Linux also segfaults here. I just
uploaded version 2.3.18-2 to Debian unstable which fixes this.

However, I believe that the code bases are different enough that a
segfault is as bad as it gets in man-db (the functions in question are
entirely different, and just happen to have the same failure case). Feel
free to prove me wrong.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                     [cjw44flatline.org.uk]

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]