OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Matt Rudge (mrudgehcs.ie)
Date: Wed May 16 2001 - 11:39:38 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    I have tested this on patched and unpatched IIS 4 & 5 servers and have found
    some strange results also. Several recently patched IIS5 servers that I
    tested are not vulnerable to the Unicode bug (as would be expected), but are
    vulnerable to this one. Similarly with patched IIS4 servers I have tried.
    However, I have tried one patched IIS4 server that proved not to be
    vulnerable - the difference... none. Apart from the fact that the
    invulnerable server was the only one I actually, physically, patched myself.
    But I can't remember what I did that would make a difference.

    This is why, for all installations, I now put all executable directories on
    a separate drive and rename the command interpreter.

    Cheers

    Matt

    -----Original Message-----
    From: neme-dhchushmail.com [mailto:neme-dhchushmail.com]
    Sent: 16 May 2001 00:16
    To: bugtraqsecurityfocus.com
    Subject: About the new IIS %252c bug.

    Hi,

    I spotted the same behaviour on my win2k + IIS 5.0 installation. When I
    installed the unicode patch this problem disappeared. Hence why I did not
    publish this. Maybe other people can reproduce this as well?
    another one that works is %252f.
    %255c and %252f (slash and backslash) worked before I applied the patch
    and ceased working afterwards.
    %255c and %252f are NOT unicode codes but hex codes. I find it strange that
    the unicode patch fixed this.
    IIS4.0 installations without the unicode patch were not vulnerable when
    I tried.

    greetz,
    nemesystm