OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Raptor (raptor0xdeadbeef.eu.org)
Date: Mon Jul 30 2001 - 12:55:45 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Obviously you need to be in the local ethernet segment to accomplish an
    attack like that. I wrote a similar tool a couple of years ago, called
    havoc. It can be downloaded from http://packetstormsecurity.org/DoS/havoc-0.1c.tgz
    and can be easily modified to suit your particular needs.

    Cheers,
    :raptor

    On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Paul Starzetz wrote:

    > There is an ARP table handling bug in Microsoft Windows protocoll
    > stacks. It seems that the arp handling code uses some inefficient data
    > structure (maybe a simple linear table?) to manage the ARP entries.
    > Sending a huge amount of ´random´ (that is random source IP and
    > arbitrary MAC) ARP packets results in 100% CPU utilization and a machine
    > lock up. The machine wakes up after the packets stream has been stopped.
    >
    > The needed traffic is not really high: the attached ARPkill code will
    > send an initial sequence of about 10000 ARP packets, then go to ´burst
    > mode´ sending definable short burst of random ARP packets every 10 msec.
    > The lockup occured at about 80kb/sec (seq about 45) on a PII/350.
    >
    > Even worse: it seems that is possible to kill a whole subnet using
    > broadcast destination MAC (that is ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) and arbitrary
    > source IP.

    Antifork Research, Inc. Mediaservice.net Srl
    http://www.0xdeadbeef.eu.org http://www.mediaservice.net