OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Charles-Edouard Ruault (cruault724.com)
Date: Tue Mar 19 2002 - 13:09:05 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Hi,

    now that you're bringing the subject on the table, i'll follow up with a
    small bug i've discovered yesterday ...
    On Linux you can "customize" the default ttl that will be used in all
    the IP packets that the box will be sending ( using
    /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_default_ttl )
    . One of the main reasons to do that , as it has been said in many
    articles, is to make your machine a little bit more difficult to
    fingerprint.
    However, while playing with this feature, i've discovered that the
    current kernel ( 2.4.18 ) and probably earlier versions, don't use this
    default value when generating the following packets :

    - ICMP reply ( of any kind )
    - TCP RST .

    Therefore, changing the ip_default_ttl on a standard kernel might do the
    opposite of what you're trying to achieve : make it much easier for an
    attacker to fingerprint your os....

    I've written a small patch ( against kernel 2.4.18 ) that fixes this
    behaviour. I'm attaching it to this email ( i've also posted in on the
    linux-kernel mailing list ).
    comments are welcome.

    Ofir Arkin wrote:

    > Subject: Identifying Kernel 2.4.x based Linux machines using UDP
    >
    > Author: Ofir Arkin (ofiratstake.com)
    >
    >
    > Linux Kernel 2.4.x has a bug with the UDP implementation which allows
    > both active and passive fingerprinting of Linux machines based on the
    > 2.4.x Kernel.
    >
    > The following is a simple nslookup query initiated from my Kernel
    > 2.4.10 based Linux machine:
    >
    > 03/16-11:49:41.531642 192.168.1.200:1024 -> x.x.x.x:53 UDP TTL:64
    > TOS:0x0 ID:0 IpLen:20 DgmLen:63 DF
    > Len: 43
    > BC 0D 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 77 77 77 .............www
    > 03 63 6E 6E 03 63 6F 6D 05 6C 6F 63 61 6C 00 00 .cnn.com.local..
    > 01 00 01 ...
    >
    > The IP Identification field value with the UDP datagram is zero (0).
    > The value will be constant and will not be changed for future UDP
    > datagrams I will be sending.
    >
    > The problem is not only with generating UDP datagrams, but also with
    > answering UDP queries. With the following example I have sent a UDP
    > datagram to the ECHO service on a Linux 2.4.18 based machine:
    >
    > 03/16-12:13:17.388211 192.168.1.200:1775 -> y.y.y.y:7
    > UDP TTL:64 TOS:0x0 ID:28256 IpLen:20 DgmLen:28
    > Len: 8
    >
    > 03/16-12:13:17.547636 y.y.y.y:7 -> 192.168.1.200:1775
    > UDP TTL:50 TOS:0x0 ID:0 IpLen:20 DgmLen:28 DF
    > Len: 8
    >
    > The IP identification field value with the answer is zero (0). It will
    > also be constant and will not changed if we further query the target.
    >
    > The biggest problem is the ability to use legitimate applications,
    > such as DNS queries with nslookup, and by sending and receiving one
    > packet only to have the ability to fingerprint the 2.4.x Kernel branch.
    >
    > The 2.2.x kernel branch seems not to be affected according to my tests.
    >
    > Combined with another fingerprinting method using ICMP this time
    > (http://www.sys-security.com/archive/bugtraq/ofirarkin2001-03.txt), we
    > are able to fingerprint the 2.4.x kernel branch and divide it into two
    > groups - 2.4.0-2.4.4 kernels, and the 2.4.5-2.4.18 kernels.
    >
    >

    -- 
    Charles-Edouard Ruault